You’re probably referring to ruzzia having three times more people than Ukraine.
There are several factors why this is not as important as it might seem.
First is that ruzzia is attacking and the attacking side usually sustains 1:3 loss ratio.
Second is that their approach was always to disregard their own, so the ratio is at least 1:5, likely even worse.
And third, is that despite they have 140 million people, after you deduct women, children, old and sick, and ruzzian tooth to tail ratio of 1:1, you end up with the maximum army of 5 million.
And they already lost 20%.
And some of those 20% were actually trained.
And men that are fit for army are also for for work.
Which all basically means that if the sanctions pressure is kept, if Ukraine has enough ammunition (and they claim 30% is already made domestically) and as long as Ukraine keeps the loss ratio in its favour, ruzzia will simply implode.
Somebody calculated that at the current “advance” speed, ruzzia will need 140 years to occupy Ukraine. If Ukraine keeps doing what it’s doing, it needs maybe two.
It’s not going to be nice two years, but with a little support, Ukraine is winning and will win.
This is the Western regime’s decades-long geopolitical ambitions in the making.
Russia invaded Ukraine, not the other way around. Russia was violating international law doing this, invading a peaceful neighbor without provocation, and has since committed numerous war-crimes.
Europe is helping Ukraine defend itself against an authoritarian regime that is committing genocide against Ukraine.
How do you figure that is wrong in any way. How do you in any way tie that to what’s going on in Gaza? Do you really believe bullies should just get their right.
Well Europe doesn’t believe that, which is also why many European countries are distancing themselves from Israel, and demanding Israel stop their atrocities in Gaza.
The rest of your post is nothing more than a slippery slope argument.
You are not just wrong, your post simply reeks that you are brainwashed by Russian propaganda. And I mean seriously brainwashed, because your arguments are decidedly against the facts to a degree you are not even making sense.
Russia invaded Ukraine, not the other way around. Russia was violating international law doing this, invading a peaceful neighbor without provocation, and has since committed numerous war-crimes.
This is the Western regime’s decades-long geopolitical ambitions in the making.
Years versus decades, it is important to know the history and the causes of escalation.
If you would like to learn about non-Western propaganda, check out Professor Jeffrey Sachs. There are also independent journalists that I have shared that lay out the politics and geopolitical events that lead us to this conflict.
In a similar aspect, if you check out the history of Israel-Iran, US-China, and other countries in the Middle East, Latin America, and Africa, you will learn they share a common backing regime and geopolitical goal: the US.
You are not just wrong, your post simply reeks that you are brainwashed by Russian propaganda. And I mean seriously brainwashed, because your arguments are decidedly against the facts to a degree you are not even making sense.
It is no surprise anything critical or contradictory to the Western propaganda narrative gets labeled the boogeyman (bots, trolls, puppets, shills, etc.), similar to the China and Iran escalations.
If you are serious about learning much more, we must always be critical of our own governments’ propaganda and be willing, not scared, to learn what is being said of dissenting views and sources.
Thanks for being willing to reply and have a small chat, even if we don’t agree on the history and true intentions of the escalations.
Western propaganda does not hide what’s going on in Israel, we know whats going on, you try to make it sound like we don’t with gaslighting.
The west never attacked the Soviet Union, the Soviet Union dissolved, and several of the former states sought cooperation with the west, which was also offered to Russia.
The Russian federation could have been the most influential and biggest economy in Europe by now, if Putin hadn’t chosen to consider us their enemy. Undermining EU and USA and invading former Soviet states.
There is no way you can blame the current situation Russia is in on the west! It’s all themselves. The hand was extended but refused.
According to your logic #Ukraine is *not* fighting against ita genocide at the hands of #Russia *because* they get tanks, ammo and general support from from the West/US/CIA/MI6?
So if I drop some body armor, old T-72 etc in Gaza you would say: its not genocide any more!
Or would it only count if I was CIA/MI6?
Mate, genocide aint just a bigly word to throw around. Whats the diff between premeditated murder, manslaughter and negligent homicide?
Hint; its not whether or not the victim wears body armor.
Sadly, it won’t stop until the last Ukrainian is sent to the front lines to die.
The West Regime continues to use smaller countries as pawns to further our geopolitical ambitions and to enrich our oligarchs.
Good thing this is not true.
You’re probably referring to ruzzia having three times more people than Ukraine. There are several factors why this is not as important as it might seem.
First is that ruzzia is attacking and the attacking side usually sustains 1:3 loss ratio. Second is that their approach was always to disregard their own, so the ratio is at least 1:5, likely even worse. And third, is that despite they have 140 million people, after you deduct women, children, old and sick, and ruzzian tooth to tail ratio of 1:1, you end up with the maximum army of 5 million.
And they already lost 20%. And some of those 20% were actually trained. And men that are fit for army are also for for work.
Which all basically means that if the sanctions pressure is kept, if Ukraine has enough ammunition (and they claim 30% is already made domestically) and as long as Ukraine keeps the loss ratio in its favour, ruzzia will simply implode.
Somebody calculated that at the current “advance” speed, ruzzia will need 140 years to occupy Ukraine. If Ukraine keeps doing what it’s doing, it needs maybe two.
It’s not going to be nice two years, but with a little support, Ukraine is winning and will win.
Interesting take.
Thanks for taking the time to explain your thought process and how you arrived at certain conclusions!
Wow that’s some extremely insane spin on the situation that Russia invaded a peaceful country, and is actively engaged in genocide.
Palestine is a genocide; they have no army and are in an imprisonment surrounded and controlled by Israel and Western forces fully supporting it.
Ukraine has an army with Western/NATO backing and CIA and MI6 intelligence as well, similar to Israel.
This is the Western regime’s decades-long geopolitical ambitions in the making.
We are now at war with Iran and heading to war with China as well.
More forever wars where securing important resources is the main goal in exchange for the working classes’ mass murder and death.
Russia invaded Ukraine, not the other way around. Russia was violating international law doing this, invading a peaceful neighbor without provocation, and has since committed numerous war-crimes.
Europe is helping Ukraine defend itself against an authoritarian regime that is committing genocide against Ukraine.
How do you figure that is wrong in any way. How do you in any way tie that to what’s going on in Gaza? Do you really believe bullies should just get their right.
Well Europe doesn’t believe that, which is also why many European countries are distancing themselves from Israel, and demanding Israel stop their atrocities in Gaza.
The rest of your post is nothing more than a slippery slope argument.
You are not just wrong, your post simply reeks that you are brainwashed by Russian propaganda. And I mean seriously brainwashed, because your arguments are decidedly against the facts to a degree you are not even making sense.
Years versus decades, it is important to know the history and the causes of escalation.
If you would like to learn about non-Western propaganda, check out Professor Jeffrey Sachs. There are also independent journalists that I have shared that lay out the politics and geopolitical events that lead us to this conflict.
In a similar aspect, if you check out the history of Israel-Iran, US-China, and other countries in the Middle East, Latin America, and Africa, you will learn they share a common backing regime and geopolitical goal: the US.
It is no surprise anything critical or contradictory to the Western propaganda narrative gets labeled the boogeyman (bots, trolls, puppets, shills, etc.), similar to the China and Iran escalations.
If you are serious about learning much more, we must always be critical of our own governments’ propaganda and be willing, not scared, to learn what is being said of dissenting views and sources.
Thanks for being willing to reply and have a small chat, even if we don’t agree on the history and true intentions of the escalations.
Western propaganda does not hide what’s going on in Israel, we know whats going on, you try to make it sound like we don’t with gaslighting.
The west never attacked the Soviet Union, the Soviet Union dissolved, and several of the former states sought cooperation with the west, which was also offered to Russia.
The Russian federation could have been the most influential and biggest economy in Europe by now, if Putin hadn’t chosen to consider us their enemy. Undermining EU and USA and invading former Soviet states.
There is no way you can blame the current situation Russia is in on the west! It’s all themselves. The hand was extended but refused.
@jimmydoreisalefty @Buffalox There is a lot to unpack there but let me focus on one thing.
According to your logic #Ukraine is *not* fighting against ita genocide at the hands of #Russia *because* they get tanks, ammo and general support from from the West/US/CIA/MI6?
So if I drop some body armor, old T-72 etc in Gaza you would say: its not genocide any more!
Or would it only count if I was CIA/MI6?
Mate, genocide aint just a bigly word to throw around. Whats the diff between premeditated murder, manslaughter and negligent homicide?
Hint; its not whether or not the victim wears body armor.