• TAG@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      So it may be worth $10 for some people, then. I am fine with a cheaper game with slightly worse graphics. I am not sure I even notice if a game is running at 60 fps or 30 fps. Even when a game dips below 30, I notice it getting a bit choppy, but a game should be engaging enough that I will not pay it any attention.

      • Tailz (she/her)@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        To me it’s instantly noticeable if a game is running at 60 or 30. It especially irks me when the original version of a game ran at 60 on much older hardware and then the remake is capped at 30 coughTTYDremakecough

        • slimerancher@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          I can tell 60 vs 30 if I switch between them. Like playing a 30 fps game after playing a 60fps one. Even then, I completely agree with you, what’s the point of the remake if it runs worse than the original?

    • Ilandar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      That would definitely be worth the $10 if you were already buying a Switch 2. A stable 30 is miles better than what we had with Scarlet/Violet.

        • djidane535@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Well, Nintendo is not known to lie in its trailers. Lagging games are lagging in the trailers as well (see GameChat or Pokémon Scarlet / Violet / Arceus trailers for example).

OSZAR »